Advertisements
Advertisements
Birthmothers & Triad Please Fight for Colorado!
Colorado House Bill 1286-- the voluntary expedited relinquishment bill is up for debate in the Senate on Monday. Your phone calls, faxes and emails are needed to help DEFEAT this bill.
If passed it will encourage agencies to bully birthmothers into rapid abandonment and speed up the relinquishment process while also bypassing court checks and balances.
While all interested parties are encouraged to contact these statesmen. It's important to hear from BIOLOGICAL MOTHERS that this bill is not fair to birth mothers and why you think so.
EMAILS are great, but PHONE CALLS and FAXES are BETTER!
------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------
The bill will be heard by the Senate Judiciary on Monday, March 10 -- CALL or FAX NOW!!
------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------
A most significant point is that this bill was written by six Colorado adoption agencies whose paid lobbyist is pushing it hard. Also the Lt Governor said adoption would be a priority this year in Colorado. As often happens when politicians set a priority on doing "something" about adoption, that "something" tends to be ill-advised. No experts are consulted excepting those whose expertise is compromised by the fact that they have a financial interest in the passage of the bill. This bill is about expediting adoptions for prospective parents who can pay agency fees, not about what is in the best interests of the child or what is fair to biological parents.
Colleagues in Colorado who attended the House hearing on the bill were told that the purpose of the bill was to "help birth mothers relinquish quickly so they could get on with their lives." We know that relinquishment is something that must not be done in haste but with careful consideration and an absence of pressure to "sign the papers."
Sponsors also explained that the bill would also help "expedite adoptions for adoptive parents." The bill allows a birth parent to sign relinquishment papers before a child is even born and then the agency would have the relinquishment papers in their possession. The papers could then be filed with the court 72 hours after the birth. Sponsor Rep. Lynn Hefley opined that the relinquishment would then be final for the birth mother. She said the seven to ten day period following the filing is only for the court to review the papers. The birth mother would no longer be involved at that point. We believe that if the birth mom signed the papers 72 hours after the birth of her child that the agency could file the papers that same day and the relinquishment would then be final, for the birthmother. All this seems like a great deal of undue haste.
The bill is designed to remove the court hearing from the process of relinquishment. Our colleagues in Colorado tell us the system there does discourage at least some agencies from being as unethical as they might possibly be but, at least some of the agencies are afraid of the judicial review process and want this bill passed to remove that review.
As long as birth mothers go to court for a relinquishment hearing there is a check and balance system operating that will help to control at least some corruption. The judges are required by the state to question the counseling the birthmothers have received at the agency. Court proceedings require the birth mother to re-think her decision again in another environment (some judges expel the agency people from the court room or chamber while the birth mom is there to make sure she is not being manipulated by the agency worker through eye contact, or other coaching). The agencies want to remove the court hearing to give them total control over the relinquishments. Result: more babies for the agencies.
A part of the bill appears to allow the birth father to terminate the birth mother's rights without her consent and that seems it would be unconstitutional. This question was brought up in House committee (HEWI) and the apparent conflict of rights may be why it is now assigned to the Senate Judiciary committee.
Rep. Fran Coleman, an adoptee, who voted against it told colleagues that she thought the legislators just didn't get to hear the opinions of birthmothers and other members of the triad since they don't have a paid lobbyist and the Agencies do.
Contact the senators on Senate Judiciary now.
Fax #s for ALL: 303-866-2012 and 303-866-4565
JIM DYER -- Senate sponsor of the bill
200 E. Coolfax
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 303-866-4866
Fax: 303-866-2012
Email: jim.dyer.senate@state.co.us
JOHN EVANS
Assistant Majority Leader of the Senate
Phone: 303-866-4881
E-Mail: john.evans.senate@state.co.us
KEN GORDON
Assistant Minority Leader of the Senate
Phone: 303-866-4875
E-Mail: ken.gordon.senate@state.co.us
DAN GROSSMAN
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4852
E-Mail: dan.grossman.senate@state.co.us
PETER C. GROFF
Phone: 303-866-2909
Email: peter.groff.house@state.co.us
MARK HILLMAN
Co-Majority Leader of the Senate
Phone: 303-866-6360
Fax: 970-867-4640
E-mail: mark.hillman.senate@state.co.us
SUE WINDELS
Phone: 303-866-4840
E-Mail: sue.windels.senate@state.co.us
The above numbers are their Capital numbers which will allow you to leave a voice mail 24 hours a day. You can get additional numbers, FAXes and emails from the Colorado Home page: [url]http://www.state.co.us.[/url] You can also get updated information about the bill on that website or call the bill room (303-866-3055) to get information.
Here are other Senate contacts. If you live in Colorado and one of these senators represents your district, please contact them and ask them to vote "NO" on HB 1286.
NORMA V. ANDERSON
Co-Majority Leader of the Senate
Capitol Phone: 303-866-3341
E-mail: norma.anderson.senate@state.co.us
JOHN ANDREWS
President of the Senate
Phone: 303-866-3342
E-Mail: john.andrews.senate@state.co.us
KEN ARNOLD
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4876
Home Phone: 303-466-2666
Fax Number: 303-439-7987
E-Mail: ken.arnold.senate@state.co.us
BRUCE CAIRNS
Capitol Phone: 303-866-3432
E-Mail: bruce.cairns.senate@state.co.us
KEN CHLOUBER
President Pro Tem
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4869
E-mail: ken.chlouber.senate@state.co.us
LEWIS ENTZ
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4871
E-mail: lewis.entz.senate@state.co.us
JOAN FITZ-GERALD
Minority Leader of the Senate
Phone: 303-866-2318
Fax: 303-866-4543
E-Mail: joan.fitzgerald.senate@state.co.us
BOB HAGEDORN
Phone: 303-866-4879
E-Mail: senbob@msn.com
DEANNA HANNA
Phone: 303-866-4857
E-mail: deanna.hanna.senate@state.co.us
JIM ISGAR
Phone: 303-866-4884
E-mail: isgarsenate@frontier.net
STEVE JOHNSON
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4853
E-Mail: steve.johnson.senate@state.co.us
ED JONES
Phone: 303-866-6364
E-mail: ed.jones.senate@state.co.us
MARYANNE "MO" KELLER
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4856
E-mail: moe.keller.senate@state.co.us
KEN KESTER
Phone: 303-866-4877
E-Mail: ken.kester.senate@state.co.us
DOUG LAMBORN
Majority Caucus Chairman
Phone: 303-866-4835
E-mail: doug.lamborn.senate@state.co.us
DOUG LINKHART
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4861
Home Phone: 303-733-3569
E-mail: doug@douglinkhart.com
RON MAY
Phone: 303-866-4866
E-Mail: ron.may.senate@state.co.us
ANDY McELHANY
Phone: 303-866-4866
ALICE J. NICHOL
Phone: 303-866-4863
Fax: 303-287-7742
E-mail: alice.nichol.senate@state.co.us
DAVID T. "DAVE" OWEN
Phone: 303-866-2586
Fax: 970-330-9600
TERRY PHILLIPS
Capitol Phone: 303-866-5291
E-mail: terry.phillips.senate@state.co.us
PEGGY REEVES
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4841
Home Phone: 970-482-8952
Mailing Address: 1931 Sandalwood Lane, Fort Collins, CO 80526
Fax Number: 303-866-4543
E-Mail: peggy.reeves.senate@state.co.us
PAULA SANDOVAL
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4862
E-Mail: paula.sandoval.senate@state.co.us
STEPHANIE TAKIS
Phone: 303-866-4855
E-Mail: stephanie.takis.senate@state.co.us
ABEL TAPIA
Capitol Phone: 303-866-4878
E-mail: abel.tapia.senate@state.co.us
JACK TAYLOR
Phone: 303-866-4866
RONALD J. "RON" TECK
Phone: 303-866-3077
E-Mail: ron.teck.senate@state.co.us
RON TUPA
Minority Caucus Chairman
Phone: 303-866-4872
E-Mail: ron.tupa.senate@state.co.us
Thank you for your efforts! Let me know the results of your contacts.
Sincerely,
RAY BUFFER
[url]www.raybuffer.com[/url]
[url]www.adoptee.2ya.com[/url]
Director
Adoptees Caucus for Truth (ACT)
[url]http://act.vze.com[/url]
Board Member and Registry Owner
Florida Search Network
[url]www.floridasearchnetwork.web1000.com/[/url]
[url]www.reunion.vze.com[/url]
Moderator
Adoptee Activists
[url]www.activist.vze.com[/url]
I am forwarding you this report on the hearings from Karen Kottmeier in Colorado:
3/10/03
Do Not Be Discouraged!!
Everyone did a wonderful job with their testimony! In spite of the vote, which was 6-1 in favor, it was about what I was expecting it to be. I am hoping we can get this thing amended, and I think we have a chance for that to happen.
Senator Gordon, as you know, if you were at the hearing, voted against HB1286. He asked the agency person "If you could expedite the court hearings (she had complained that it took 4 or 5 months to get a relinquishment hearing) would that fix the problems you are having with the process?" She said "yes", so he voted against the bill . Obviously, all that stuff about birth mothers "needing to get on with their lives" was irrelevant. And, we knew that.
It might help if we had some recent stories about agency dishonesty, corruption, or manipulation, but some of us testified about things that happened fairly recently, so I am not sure that it would matter. The conflict of interest is clearly there, with the agencies having a business interest in placing babies, and the birth parents having an interest in exploring their options. Then, you have the adoptive parents paying for everything, which creates another conflict of interest. Senator Evans finally began to see this . He noted that what the agencies called "birth parent protections" was not what was written in the bill. He also said that the agencies had all the control.
I brought copies of the yellow pages adoption ads and Melanie passed them out. I wanted the committee to see the business interest in adoption.
Senator Dyer and Senator Arnold are both pro-life and they saw this expedited relinquishment process as a pro-life issue, which I suspected they would. Of course, that is illogical. People choose abortion, or not, usually very early in pregnancy. It is only later that they make the decision on adoption or raising the child.
We have had to deal with the same illogic coming from pro-choice people, who have felt that the "adoption choice" is just like the "abortion choice."
A couple a years ago , I read that the pro-choice and pro-life factions in government and the private sector had decided to "lay down their arms" and compromise. The compromise they decided upon was adoption. They decided to promote adoption, rather than argue about pro-life and pro-choice causes so much anymore. So, we are caught in the middle, because they have decided that all adoption legislation is a good thing and they will promote it without knowing much of anything about it. One pro-life activist I read about said that when she started looking deeper into adoption, she realized that it was much more complex than she had thought.
We are experiencing some of that kind of legislation now. Another problem we have is that the state is hundreds of millions of dollars in debt and I am afraid that will really affect the court system. But, there may still be a solution there. Magistrates are cheaper than judges. Politics is about compromise.
I have never heard such excellent testimony as I did today. You were all sharp, professional sounding, you made your points, and I felt proud to have been associated with all of you.
It was definitely made clear today that 44 states do NOT have pre-birth relinquishment by mothers with finalization 72 hours after birth.
At this point, what we must try to do is gain support in the rest of the Senate, so that we can at least try to amend the bill so it is not so bad. Every one should contact Senator Gordon, who voted against it, and ask him to lobby against it. Tell him, again of your concerns. His e-mail , phone, etc. is on the Colo. Home page ([url]http://www.state.co.us[/url]). Please thank him for voting against the bill. We want him to contact other Democratic senators who might be of help. They need to understand this is not a "choice "issue for women. We need to clear up that confusion.
Voluntary is not voluntary if you cannot get out of it when you most need to. Allowing a parent to sign a relinquishment too soon and then finalize it is like allowing people to drive without a seat belt on. People used to argue against seat belts but it was proven that they were good for the public. The same for infant safety seats. There are some things that you just shouldn't allow people to do, and giving up their kids too soon is one of them. Amy was right. There are some choices we just shouldn't allow people to make. Especially when they cannot get themselves out of it!! Then it is no choice at all.
Next, contact your own senator. You can find out who that is by contacting your County Clerk's Office. Your own senator represents you. This should be done immediately, as the bill will soon be read and debated, and voted upon on the senate floor. There will be no more public hearings but we can still write letters, send emails, and phone, or fax them, until they have voted on it. After you have contacted your own senator, contact as many of the rest of the senate as you can. Express your same concerns. Keep it short. One senator you should definitely contact is senator Linkhart . He is a Democrat, an adoptive parent and I have already talked to him. He is interested. He sponsored our open records bill a few years ago.
Please remember that there are forces beyond our control. Just as there are people who are working to keep the records sealed, there are people who are working to expedite relinquishment. I have been doing this work for a long time and I have noticed that once an idea gets started it takes awhile before it plays itself out. None of us did anything wrong today. We all did very well. Most of them had their minds already made up before the hearing (they usually do, I am told) and I am pleased that they asked as many questions as they did. The agencies were clearly much less comfortable than they were in HEWI.
If we keep working at it, we may be able to get it amended to something we can at least live with.
Thank you, all of you, for your very hard work.
Forwarded by,
Ray Buffer
[url]www.raybuffer.com[/url]
[url]www.adoptee.2ya.com[/url]
Director
Adoptees Caucus for Truth (ACT)
[url]http://act.vze.com[/url]
Board Member and Registry Owner
Florida Search Network
[url]www.floridasearchnetwork.web1000.com/[/url]
[url]www.reunion.vze.com[/url]
Moderator
Adoptee Activists
[url]www.activist.vze.com[/url]
SIGN THIS PETITION: [url]http://obc.2ya.com[/url]
Advertisements
Latest status on HB 1286
from Karen Kottmeier
I received word late on Friday that the bill had been laid over until Monday. We can expect that it may be heard on the senate floor on Monday, possibly amended, and then voted upon. We, of course, would love to have it killed but I never really thought we had much of a chance for that.
A number of states have revised their statutes in recent years to place parents in these high pressure situations. I also think some of our lawmakers think that if we make adoption "easier" maybe we won't have so many "abandoned" babies in dumpsters. The problem with that kind of thinking is it is so hard to disprove.
I think this bill has been misinterpreted as both a prolife and a prochoice bill by lawmakers on both sides of those issues. But, if HB 1286 goes into effect, only the agencies will have the choices.
We still have the rest of the weekend to email senators, or FAX them or leave voice messages. I will be voice messaging them, myself, this weekend. Their voice mails at the capitol run 24 hours. They have home office numbers, too, which are also listed on the Colorado Home page at: [url]http://www.state.co.us.[/url]
When I send a voice message, I write out several little speeches, so I can hit several different issues. I leave my name, and where I live. I also leave my number if I would like a call back (sometimes they call back ). I read my speech and then I say thank you. Of course, I ask them to vote against the bill. Be sure to mention the number of the bill in your speech. It gets to be very easy to do this after awhile.
I have been doing this work for a long time and this bill really was no surprise. Of course anyone can write a bill and they don't have to share that knowledge with anyone else until they introduce it into the legislature. Until we had a chance to see what it looked like we couldn't react to it. Of course, since these agencies had already worked with Pat Taylor and me for many years on the Task Force and on the Access to Records bills, we were already known to them..
Adoption is really a family issue and needs to be viewed as such, in my opinion. Parents who go to an adoption agency are looking for help. They should not be viewed as suspect. Birth parents will always be connected to their children, even if they have to relinquish them for adoption. That connection should be viewed in a positive manner. Children cannot always live with all of their parents, but they will always be part of them. Our family system needs to be based on support, not competition and destruction.
Anyway, we are now a known group.
Take care,
Karen
Forwarded By:
Ray Buffer
[url]http://adoptee.2ya.com[/url]