Advertisements
Okay that was probably a shocking thread title, but that is what the call with a referral service felt like today. Their first question was how much are you willing to budget followed by what do you want. (Gee is this like ordering a new mattress?) The entire contact left me feeling....icky. It was implied that we'd need to go out of state and that we should up our budget at least another 15,000 (OMG are you kidding me!) I mean they might as well as said, how much will you pay, right?
We've been looking at other options since our match failed from changing agencies to using a referral service. I feel kinda disheartened by the process, but really got the feeling today that these referral services are shopping out families at the same time they are shopping out emoms and the highest bidder wins. The thing is, I get the feeling that those profiting are the lawyers who are making the referral. (I know we've all discussed this ad nauseum on other threads.)
Anyway, I pretty much told DH that I'm done driving myself nuts over this. That we stay put with our agency and just "grin and bear" the wait. I want an ethical adoption and I want an open adoption and I just need to suck it up. We may switch to a more "open adoption" friendly agency, but that will be when it's time to renew our homestudy this summer. I pray, pray for a match before then, but I really need to let this go for now and let God call these shots.
Like
Share
I can see that this thread is going the way all the reform threads eventually go....down south. I'm having trouble even thinking of anything that will add to the conversation in a rational, positive manner without offending some adoptive parents.
Crick, you make some excellent points. As far as birth/first mothers working on behalf of adoption reform and open records, many of us have been there, done that. I've been speaking publicly as an activist for over 30 years now. I'm still a consultant for the adoption agency I relinquished through back in 1972, and they've listened to much of what I have to say for many years now. I've testified before legislative bodies, written articles for various newspapers, and worked closely with adoptees in the fight to gain access to their original birth certificates. And, YES, we've made a difference in the past 30 years...a huge difference.
But up until recently, it's pretty much been adoptees and birth moms who've taken up the cause of adoption reform and open records. I'm not bothered at all if adoptive parents don't want to join us in trying to ensure that pregnant women are treated fairly and ethically by agencies, lawyers, and facilitators. But for pete's sake, please join us in fighting for adoptee rights. Your children are adoptees...and one day will be adults who will have to obtain passports and drivers' licenses, adults who one day may feel curious about their origins and want to know more about the women who gave them life.
Like Beth, I got a lot of flack in reform circles when I joined these forums. But I believed then, just as I do now, that we NEED to build a bridge between all three sides of the triad. I'm just not sure how to go about doing that anymore....
Advertisements
sbaglio
I'm assuming that you felt demonized? I'm sorry that you were made to feel that way. But you're making a generalization that I don't think all birthmoms feel. My kids birthmoms still communicate with and occasionally go out for meals with the SWs from our agency, years after they placed their kids with us. They did not feel demonized at all, obviously.
sbaglio
I'm assuming that you felt demonized? I'm sorry that you were made to feel that way. But you're making a generalization that I don't think all birthmoms feel. My kids birthmoms still communicate with and occasionally go out for meals with the SWs from our agency, years after they placed their kids with us. They did not feel demonized at all, obviously.
I know I started an "adoption reform" thread about 2 years ago, and out of 13 pages, there were only a sad few participants from start to finish...but at least those participants were willing to have a respectful dialogue...and at least they WANTED to make a change.
It seemed to be a pretty good discussion - not like the back and forth finger pointing cr*p I see going on here half the time.
The problem is, there are so many people on these boards that have a personal issue with one another that when person A comes to a thread like this to give a point of view, person B (or C, D, E) makes ASSUMPTIONS that the POV is somehow sinister or slighting when it very well may NOT be.
If anyone cares to see how "far" we got in the reform discussion (look at page 7 for the list we came up with and REMEMBER it WAS 2 years ago, so please...) here it is:
[url]http://forums.adoption.com/general-adoptive-parent-support/368712-adoption-reform.html[/url]
ErinandWill
I want an ethical adoption and I want an open adoption and I just need to suck it up.
Advertisements
caths1964
Leeah, I understand that - the only reason I even said about adopting from foster care on another thread is that I didn't want to people to think that I couldn't care for a child that wasn't biologically mine. I actually would rather foster than adopt and I would much prefer an older child anyway (over 8) but if I ever did adopt, it would be of a long term foster child. I am not in the position to foster a child at the moment but will never say never. That was all I was trying to say is that I personally wouldn't adopt from DIA, especially because I have no particular wish for an infant per se.
kakuehl
Gee, Hummerman, when I placed, computers were the size of a large room and there was no such thing as Windows or Apple....
My ob/gyn set me up with the state. The agency D's parents used, didn't tell them until after I signed the final papers that they were getting a son. (Matching included checking the height, hair and eye color of the birthparents to those of the aparents. Ironically I think one of D's sons looks a lot like D's adad!)
BethVA62
Imagine for a moment what it is like for an adoptee to see this stuff. I can tell you I have spent entirely too much time during my life trying not to feel like a product or property that has been marketed, sold and purchased. I wasn't.
IRL I know seven couples that have paid well over $150,000 to be parents to their newborns, some more than once. And it only took weeks, not months or years.
First of all the credentials and the disclaimers: I am a birthmom in a fully open adoption. My son is 27. I am a therapist; a clinical social worker that specializes in adoption and trauma/loss. I have educated others about open adoption/adoption reform for over 24 years. I recently presented a number of trainings for the Infant Adoption Awareness project through the Arizona Children's Home on pregnancy counseling. Here is my take on it. Women (and men) in a crisis pregnancy are just that... in crisis. There are specific protocols for crisis interventions, and except for a handful of agencies, no one uses these interventions in pregnancy counseling.The bottom line is that the neurophysiology of a person in crisis is vastly different that someone who is not. It effects decision making and the ability to retain and process information. There is a great amount of physiological dysregulation that impacts mood, emotion and self-esteem. Crisis intervention needs to be the first approach in pregnancy counseling. Anything less will not provide those in crisis pregnancies what they need.
Advertisements
Raven - I know how much work has gone into reform and how much of it has been done by first moms & adoptees. My point on aparents being expected to do their part (and we should) is simply that on many threads it turns into "Well, nothing will change because those evil aparents won't do their jobs". That isn't going to do anything positive. Just here on this thread alone several have come right out and said they blame aparents for lack of ethics in adoption. Huh.
As it's been said so many times on here and everywhere it goes all ways but most on this thread have only been interested in the blame game. (and again, that's on all sides)
There's just a few members who, for whatever reason, are always intent on playing that stupid game of blame, snide, and attacks. Maybe it's just time to ban them because they certainly don't add anything positive.
Hmm...
Leeah
Caths, the problem with the "I would only adopt through foster care" argument is that it isn't as easy as it sounds.
When I first started the process, I thought I would adopt through the foster care system. I took the 30 hour training course and then came the home study. The SW told me straight off the bat that if I wanted to adopt (not just temporary foster) I needed to go to a private agency and do IA or DIA. So here I am.
Disclaimer: I'm not saying there's anything wrong with your feelings about this- at all. Where I live it just isn't realistic. Yes, there are plenty of children in the system but they're not legally free for adoption and most likely will never be.
crick
There's just a few members who, for whatever reason, are always intent on playing that stupid game of blame, snide, and attacks. Maybe it's just time to ban them because they certainly don't add anything positive. Hmm...
Advertisements
SupaModel
Sorry but I think post was worth me coming out of MY self imposed exile! Thank you for listening!
lovemy2boys
When I read the first line of that thread I started two years ago, it basically asks that people please put aside the differences and come together respectfully.
Hope springs eternal, I guess. :arrow: