Advertisements
Advertisements
Posts are by Sunshinemama. She brings it up in the reported post but she is quoting her previous post.
In my opinion, her posts with her royal 'we' are questioning moderator actions as well as personal and need to go, but they are referenced in other posts so it is a fair amount of editing. Wanted to make sure you were ok with it first Crick.
For the easiest clean up, delete her last post and Pink's post in reference. The one sentence she has in the earlier post about this forum was pretty much ignored, so we'll just leave it.
She pm'd me so I'll be able to address her "privacy complaint".
If she posts again in regards to forum rules that she doesn't understand, we'll just ban her from the thread.
Advertisements
Done. And she posted again so I deleted that one as well. She will now be contacting you of the unfairness of her posts being deleted.
I banned her from the thread after reading her post. She replied to my pm at 9:13 a.m., so had presumably READ my pm to her that specifically told her she could not attack a member. Replies to me in a snotty pm and posts at 9:30 what you deleted.
I just love Sundays full of this crap, don't you?
And now lets discuss who should and should not be allowed to posts on certain forums. :grr:
[url]http://forums.adoption.com/foster-parent-support/424059-implications-bio-parents-going-public-4.html[/url]
Advertisements
I just moved the thread to Openness in Foster Care. This way the FP's support forum isn't bogged down by Emoia's refusal and inability to accept her wrong doing and actions that got her kids removed.