Advertisements
This has the potential to get heated, so I just ask that you participate respectfully and what I'm hoping is that we all really try to see another's point of view and feelings to gain more understanding between us all.:)
Sometimes I read threads and realize depending which side of the triad we are on, our perceptions are very different on the same situation. I wonder if some of us are truly seeing the situation for what it is and basing opinions on it or are we only really drawing from our personal side/experience?
For example...
If a first mom posts the following...
"My agency lied to me and treated me unfairly", it seems that the posts that follow are more geared towards "You seem bitter and negative and need to "let go".
If an adoptive mom posts the same statement, it seems that the posts following are more along the lines of "You shouldn't take that! You should sue them!"
Another example...
If an adoptive mom posts
"I'm worried about bonding with my child because he'll already be 4 months old", it seems we tell her "Don't worry, babies can adapt and with the "right" bonding techniques, he'll attach."
Yet, if a first mom posts that she is legally changing her mind about placement and wants her 1 month old baby back, we are bound to see posts of "Obviously it's your decision, but you need to really think about the baby because he's bonded with his amom now and he'll grieve that loss."
So...do we tend to post "in favor" or "side with" the part of the triad we are on? Can we truly ever be objective about our perceptions?
Thoughts?
Like
Share
TxMom65
I walk a fine line of trying to make a family and treat my daughter as if I gave birth to her while respecting the love she has for the woman who did.
Advertisements
bethy724
On top of the "sides" you have the "know it all's" that just saw 20/20 or dateline & want to inform you how blessed or lucky your child is because you adopted them. It makes no sense to me that a person should be "lucky" to have shelter & food & love - seems like a right most take for granted.
Joe,
I am so glad that you brought that up abut celebrating TPR. While I can totally understand that there is finally an end to things , it is also a begining of a new start. Even still it is sad. I see it all the time in my work. Parents so lost in their addictions and behaviors that they can't even take care of themselves, let alone a baby /child that is totally dependant on them.
Speaking of TPRs, I am always bothered by PAPs requesting prayer for them when a Bmom gives birth. I always pray for God's will. I am a firm believer that the baby that is meant to belong with a PAP will find their arms and while I can support and comfort a failed match, I always pray and thank God that a bmom was going to parent.
While I think adoption is wonderful, it is always better if it didn't have to happen. A major peeve of mind is when bmoms feel they owe their babies to PAPs or they are afraid of hurting the PAPs.
Whenever I see an emom post about not being sure about an adoption plan I will always answer them. I think it is really a good thing that emoms have doubts. As strange as it sounds. At least if there are doubts early on she will have at least thought it through and hopefully will get counsel to help her explore her options.
I think too that someof these younger bmoms(older ones too) are not really aware of the magnatude of future pain adoption can bring. I am not saying that they cannot come to terms and be at peace with their decision to place, just that they need to know that this is such a life changing life altering decision that will always be with them.
EZ
EZ2Luv
I think too that someof these younger bmoms(older ones too) are not really aware of the magnatude of future pain adoption can bring. I am not saying that they cannot come to terms and be at peace with their decision to place, just that they need to know that this is such a life changing life altering decision that will always be with them.
EZ
I KNOW that every birthmother is not the same and they have not had the same experiences. However, I seem to see a pattern that confuses and upsets me. This is in birthmothers who do NOT have an open adoption but who placed through legal or agency, not CPS..First, they talk about how they "respect" the adoptive parents. How they are happy or hopeful that their child is living a life that they could not (or believed they could not) give the child at the time of birth. How pleased they were about what they knew about the family who received their child.They talk about the pain, the "missing pieces" the hard times (holidays, birthdays, arrival of other bio-children in the family, etc.) How they were not prepared for the "not healing" and "not getting over it" that they were told would happen.Then, comes "MY Child turns 18 in three days. I know how to contact them because I have tracked them down on Facebook, have their e-mail address, know their home address, etc. I plan to send them a birthday greeting and let them know I am open to contact and want contact. I have been waiting eighteen years for this and now I don't have to wait any longer."If anyone dares to suggest that the adoptive parent is still in the picture and perhaps their wishes should be consulted -- "At 18, their child is now an adult. He/she is no longer their child and they have no right to object legally. If they do object, it is morally wrong and they must be neurotic, possessive, selfish people."Is it any wonder that one forum member said it felt like they were regarded as a "babysitter" for 18 years? Another said he would only adopt internationally, or a domestic child whose parents were deceased to avoid this situation.Why does respect for the adoptive parent end at the stroke of midnight and when the child (still emotionally most are children) turns 18 the adoptive parent is just a potential barrier to reunion?
Advertisements
I try to be objective when I read and post on threads, but sometimes my own experiences get in the way. I would imagine this happens to a lot of us.
I have noticed how some people tend to state their experiences as fact rather than opinion and that usually gets a debate going. Yes. it is THEIR fact, but not everyone's. Does that make sense?
Not every birthmom is this great person who only gave up her child FOR the child. Some are drug addicts that just don't seem to care. And some are somewhere in the middle and some have other unique reasons.
OA's are not best for EVERY child. Closed adoptions are not best Every child. Semi-OA's are not best for every child.
It's not One Size Fits All. That can be said for everything we experience in life. No one experience is the same as the next. Yet, some people tend to force their reasonings and their desires on others based on how THEY feel, not on how the OTHER person feels.
... people who read ONE post by ONE person and suddenly everyone that has to carry the label that person wears is exactly like that person. I am not like all first parents, I am not like all adopted adults, my parents are not like all adoptive parents. We're all different, the world would be pretty darn boring if we were all the same.
... people who should be getting themselves educated about adoption, first parent, adoptive parent, and adopted adult alike, yet they still can only subscribe to the "Lifetime" view of people.
... people who could act with empathy and understanding yet seem to feel the need to run around acting like five year olds and putting other people down in order to feel good about their situation.
... people who cannot step out of their cage, oh yeah, it isn't even a box when you can't consider something else for a second, and look around the world and see that nearly everyone has some good in them.
... people who proclaim to have firm beliefs in something, yet their words constantly betray that.
MamaS
I KNOW that every birthmother is not the same and they have not had the same experiences. However, I seem to see a pattern that confuses and upsets me. This is in birthmothers who do NOT have an open adoption but who placed through legal or agency, not CPS..
First, they talk about how they "respect" the adoptive parents. How they are happy or hopeful that their child is living a life that they could not (or believed they could not) give the child at the time of birth. How pleased they were about what they knew about the family who received their child.
They talk about the pain, the "missing pieces" the hard times (holidays, birthdays, arrival of other bio-children in the family, etc.) How they were not prepared for the "not healing" and "not getting over it" that they were told would happen.
Then, comes "MY Child turns 18 in three days. I know how to contact them because I have tracked them down on Facebook, have their e-mail address, know their home address, etc. I plan to send them a birthday greeting and let them know I am open to contact and want contact. I have been waiting eighteen years for this and now I don't have to wait any longer."
If anyone dares to suggest that the adoptive parent is still in the picture and perhaps their wishes should be consulted -- "At 18, their child is now an adult. He/she is no longer their child and they have no right to object legally. If they do object, it is morally wrong and they must be neurotic, possessive, selfish people."
Is it any wonder that one forum member said it felt like they were regarded as a "babysitter" for 18 years? Another said he would only adopt internationally, or a domestic child whose parents were deceased to avoid this situation.
Why does respect for the adoptive parent end at the stroke of midnight and when the child (still emotionally most are children) turns 18 the adoptive parent is just a potential barrier to reunion?
Advertisements
crick
As a PARENT, I want to be involved because you are right...parenting does not end at age 18. It's not a magical age and I personally think it's a bit unrealistic to expect a successful reunion at that age. (I'm sure it happens, but norm?)
Yet as an ADOPTIVE parent, I want to be respectful of this event and relationship that is not mine and not cross lines with my all out I'm the MOM stamp on my forehead. kwim?
MamaS
I KNOW that every birthmother is not the same and they have not had the same experiences. However, I seem to see a pattern that confuses and upsets me. This is in birthmothers who do NOT have an open adoption but who placed through legal or agency, not CPS..First, they talk about how they "respect" the adoptive parents. How they are happy or hopeful that their child is living a life that they could not (or believed they could not) give the child at the time of birth. How pleased they were about what they knew about the family who received their child.They talk about the pain, the "missing pieces" the hard times (holidays, birthdays, arrival of other bio-children in the family, etc.) How they were not prepared for the "not healing" and "not getting over it" that they were told would happen.Then, comes "MY Child turns 18 in three days. I know how to contact them because I have tracked them down on Facebook, have their e-mail address, know their home address, etc. I plan to send them a birthday greeting and let them know I am open to contact and want contact. I have been waiting eighteen years for this and now I don't have to wait any longer."If anyone dares to suggest that the adoptive parent is still in the picture and perhaps their wishes should be consulted -- "At 18, their child is now an adult. He/she is no longer their child and they have no right to object legally. If they do object, it is morally wrong and they must be neurotic, possessive, selfish people."Is it any wonder that one forum member said it felt like they were regarded as a "babysitter" for 18 years? Another said he would only adopt internationally, or a domestic child whose parents were deceased to avoid this situation.Why does respect for the adoptive parent end at the stroke of midnight and when the child (still emotionally most are children) turns 18 the adoptive parent is just a potential barrier to reunion?
Mommy24
I struggle with this, I am of the belief that 18 is not a magical age and that while they are considered adults who can die for our country, have the right to vote, go out and live their own lives, etc... I do believe that the adoptive parents should be contacted first. [QUOTE][QUOTE]With that said, go search the adoptee forums and look for posts on this subject and you will find that alot of adoptees do not want their parents contacted first. They feel that all of their lives decisions have been made for them and this is the one chance they get to "call the shots". [/QUOTE
Just as is our human nature, I too relate most with birthmothers as I am one myself. I think I'm a fairly rational and empathatic person but it is really hard for me to switch roles and see things from the aparents perspective. I have tried really really hard to have a relationship with my sons aparents and they have essentially been 100% completely fake with me. They have tolerated me because I'm their son's bmom but his a mom in particular has never responded to my attempts at a friendship and I have since given up. It is super hard, as a birthmother, to have his aparents show you pictures of the very day you left the hospital with him in the nursery and see pictures of them just a scant 2 hours later smiling and holding him and he is wearing the same outfit you last saw him in. And them telling you how happy he was when they picked him up, and you trying to hold the tears in and them going on and on and on about that day, the best day of their life and the worst day of yours. So yes, it is hard for me to relate to aparents but I still try because I do realize not everyone is the same and not all aparents are like his. They have done many things like this to me, and I have come to realize it is their way of telling me-'he is ours'. So for me, it is really hard to relate to aparents. But don't mistake me not being able to relate to me not wanting to or not trying to. It is more like I kind of feel like "can't we all just get along?" but i'm the only one saying it in my triad. I am forever grateful to his aparents and to all aparents for stepping in for a birthmother who makes the heartwrenching decision to relinquish. They raised my son when I was unable to and for that I will be forever grateful. But I DO NOT regard them as a babysitter but it is interesting that someone else posted that because that is exactly what my son said the first day we met in person, after only speaking to each other for 7 days prior on the phone. He told me, "they were the best babysitters even though you didn't pick them". That always bothered me, because I would never in a million years look at his aparents that way. I told him, 'no, they are your parents,you have always had 2 sets of parents". I would never repeat that to his parents because I felt that would hurt them and we all have enough hurt in the triad. However, like I said, I have tried in my triad, and everything they ever did to me or said to me, I never ever repeated to my son because I DO relate to that side of the triad-the adopted children, based on the many many long talks I have had with him. Sorry to ramble here, but bottom line is I'm trying to relate to all sides of the triad but like everything else in life it all goes back to your own personal experiences and mine are not too great with my sons aparents.
Advertisements
I've been thinking about this for a few days. I agree with what most have posted in that I am a birthmother, so I do have more empathy for a birthmom, because I've been there. But I always try to walk the mile so to speak. I don't like it when I see forums/blogs etc promoting "sides" (not that you are doing that crick, I think that you are actually attempting the opposite by making us think about it, which I think is so important!) because I don't see it as black and white. For me, it's about respect, regardless of the triad side. I have read plenty about birthmoms who IMO DON'T respect boundaries or the role of adoptive moms regardless of circumstance, and just because I am a birthmom, doesn't mean I automatically agree. And sometimes I get discouraged when my opinion is dismissed because "you're a birthmom, therefore of course you feel X,Y or Z." I would have to say nine times to ten, I agree because as a human, and a mother, I just do. But I also think it's important to bring my persepective to the table so that others can learn mine, as I do theirs. I know it's also human nature to take our own experiences and project them, and it does create a bias, even when it's not intentional. I also feel that there IS a sort of uneven balance in the relationship no matter how hard we try, because that's adoption for you. When I was pg with my DD, I know that for her mom, she hung on every word, got nervous when I didn't answer my phone, because she at that time was not her mother legally. She had to have faith that I was going to follow through, even though I legally didn't have to, KWIM? Now that she's her mom, I'm on the other side, hanging on to every word and praying for a response. When I think of that, I'm reminded how "alike" we all are in adoption, and how at the end of the day, it really is all about the child. Or it should be. A wise woman (you know who you are!) told me recently that adoption is not picture perfect, and sometimes we can't always check our egos at the door. And that makes sense, not just in adoption, but in general. For me, I try to see through the side and relate to the relationship in it's organic form, and try to understand that the problems we all have are relationship issues in general, just in the context of adoption. We all have unique experiences, but I think at least here what brings us together is the fact that we are here to learn and grow because we want it to be successful for our children. If we didn't care, we'd be hooked on some other website like Facebook(tho I confess to being hooked on both :p )\ OK, I'm done rambling now :)