Advertisements
Advertisements
And what point is it too anti-adoption?
Personally I think her posts are too much, but I don't know.
[url]http://forums.adoption.com/considering-your-options/374273-please-help-difficult-decision.html[/url]
Like
Share
Her latest posts are definitely anti-adoption. She is trying to offer her opinion as the be-all, end-all;that adoption is not an answer for the poster and all adoptions are bad.
Like
Share
Advertisements
I have to say, I am a Sunday School teacher, I read the Bible daily, but her posting of scripture the way she is, is totally getting on my nerves.
Like
Share
[url]http://forums.adoption.com/adoptee-support/372537-my-wife-doesnt-understand-my-feelings-about-being-adopted-2.html[/url] on this thread too she links to an anti adoption site. i'm going to delete it if someone else does not first. am i wrong?
Like
Share
I think it's best that Brandy did it. If it had been one of us evil adopters, she would have made a bigger stink. Of course I am sure she thinks we have brainwashed Brandy.
Like
Share
Advertisements
Brook,
I don't think you're wrong for deleting FC's post - because it was hers...but I don't believe AdoptionCrossroads is anti-adoption.
They are very much pro-ethical practices. They take the position that agencies don't act ethically - and as such, children who would have never been placed, were placed.
They are very supportive of adoption, in full disclosure situations - from what I understand...it's the unethical crap (as well as closed records etc) they have a real problem with.
I think we need to be careful about what we label as anti - we need to make sure we're not calling something anti-adoption, simply because they use language we're uncomfortable with...
Crossroads is a site created by and for adoptees and birth parents...sometimes, we translate someones anger over a situation as anti-adoption.
It's very possible to be angry about a number of issues related to adoption and still consider adoption a good thing - I do it every day :)
But then again - a lot of people translate my 'anger' as being anti-adoption - and NOTHING could be further from the truth...
Like
Share
momraine
I think it's best that Brandy did it. If it had been one of us evil adopters, she would have made a bigger stink. Of course I am sure she thinks we have brainwashed Brandy.
LOL!
Thanks Brandy. Just wasn't sure where it became toooo anti-adoption. Though she sure managed to keep getting more anti with each post!
Like
Share
ok...i am so sorry...actually i just clicked on 2 things and saw things that i thought of as negative....but i didn't research much further than that bc of who it was. i am sorry...i will be more through next time. i understand what you are saying completely. :)
BrandyHagz
Brook,
I don't think you're wrong for deleting FC's post - because it was hers...but I don't believe AdoptionCrossroads is anti-adoption.
They are very much pro-ethical practices. They take the position that agencies don't act ethically - and as such, children who would have never been placed, were placed.
They are very supportive of adoption, in full disclosure situations - from what I understand...it's the unethical crap (as well as closed records etc) they have a real problem with.
I think we need to be careful about what we label as anti - we need to make sure we're not calling something anti-adoption, simply because they use language we're uncomfortable with...
Crossroads is a site created by and for adoptees and birth parents...sometimes, we translate someones anger over a situation as anti-adoption.
It's very possible to be angry about a number of issues related to adoption and still consider adoption a good thing - I do it every day :)
But then again - a lot of people translate my 'anger' as being anti-adoption - and NOTHING could be further from the truth...
Like
Share