Advertisements
Advertisements
I feel sometimes like decisions are made that are "in the best interest of the child" and for some that is not seeing the birthmother and for others that is seeing the birthmother. I know people have strong feelings and arguments for both sides, But no matter what you feel, I tend to feel these decisions are really being made on some level for what is good for the adults in the situation.
I want my son to be happy. But, who is to say that he is going to want one way or the other. I know lots of adoptees who do not know their birthfamily and are fine with that, including my father and cousin who have never wanted to search and don't feel any connections to the women who placed them.
On the other hand, I also know couples who have open adoptions and it is wonderful for the children.
I think both can work.
I'm thinking maybe I should just leave it up to my son. If I stay in contact through letters and pictures with his birthmother than he will have the option of meeting her oneday if he chooses. Maybe he will want to. Maybe he won't! But, why should we decide for him??
What do ya all think?
Peace,
K
I think you pose an interesting question. My outlook is that this decision isn't any different from all the other decisions we make as parents based on what we think is in our child's best interest.
As parents, we must decide where they'll go to school, what they'll eat, whether or not to take them to church and if so, which one. We make those decisions because they're not equipped to do it yet. As parents, we have information that we can use to decide about contact that a child doesn't have the capacity to analyze. If children could make every decision for themselves, we'd be unnecessary.
Advertisements
I think it is a fair question, and I also think it is fair if a child is older and decides THEY don't want to continue to have contact that all parents respect their wishes. We just had a visit yesterday and the comment was made to "be a big happy family". That is great in a perfect world, but having adopted thru the foster system and knowing the reasons we are in the situation to begin with, should they relapse into that lifestyle again...what then?
In many ways at this point, I think our open adoption is more for the birth family than us or even Bear. Maybe just because it is so hit and miss with contact from them. This was the first visit in a year with b-mom.
HBV
...this decision isn't any different from all the other decisions we make as parents based on what we think is in our child's best interest.
I agree with this statement - and that is why bparents should not be allowed to retain legal rights once a child is adopted. Once a legal visitation, or other "Agreement" is signed by both parties then the bparent retains whatever rights those were. In my case the bmom then turned around and filed numerous legal motions against us. She had free legal aid (and we can't possibly pay what the State of Alabama has paid her attorneys).
These sorts of issues are readily swept aside by those who have not experienced the types of problems some of us have in open adoptions. Personally, I never dreamed this could happen.
As I have stated numerous times, I had wonderful hopes of us being "one big happy family" - but as Bug&Bearsmommy stated "That is great in a perfect world, but having adopted thru the foster system and knowing the reasons we are in the situation to begin with, should they relapse into that lifestyle again...what then?"
Then the aparents must either (a) allow visitation even if it is not in the child's best interest or (b) shell out even MORE $$ and go back to court. Once you have been bankrupted by attorney fees in cases like mine, then the idea of spending even more sends me (financially) reeling.
I'm so glad for those of you who have what I had hoped for in an open adoption. It is not, however, in every situation, an ideal which becomes reality.
We've all ready discussed this in our family. When/if Munchkin decides that she doesn't want face to face contact with me, D will still deliver regular updates so that I am not left wondering if she is okay, growing well, etc. It is important to discuss this within your own situation so that it's not a shock to either side later in life.
D and I respect each other not only as Mothers but as friends. And while she would never force Munchkin to have a relationship with me, she made a promise to me in regards to updates on the Munchkin. Likewise, during this time, I would send updates to D instead of to Munchkin so that when/if she came out of this no-contact phase, she could read what I did, etc, during that time of no-contact.
:)
Very Smart Jenna....
Hmm I think E and I might need to have a talk about this later. Not now 1st bday and all....no reason to add stress.
Advertisements
LOL, no, probably not a discussion for the first birthday. D was actually the one who brought the conversation up, for which I was glad because I didn't know how to broach the subject without seeming rude, etc.
I know I hate that wierd uncomfortable feeling when things are discussed about what ifs in our open adoption future.
On a totally side note I am bummed dh and I talked last night and he wont let me pay 20 for the membership upgrade.... :( I am very sad