Advertisements
Here we go. Why in the world did I think it might be any different so many years later? The judge's latest order states, in direct opposition to court records and transcripts, that the adoption is collateral to the visitation "Agreement." He has continued her free legal services. He ordered us to mediation (as per the "Agreement") for which we have to pay and she does not. Even worse - my son's Guardian ad Litem filed against us to have our request for dismissal dismissed. He has signed on, and/or filed himself, every single motion against us. The State Bar Association did nothing with my complaint or my response. Lawyers investigating lawyers - now that's a... (better not said). In Alabama you are not allowed a "contigent" adoption but apparently are allowed a "collateral" adoption. Again - this seems to me a Supreme Court issue but of course my lawyer says just stay the course. I'm back on the waiting track... she does not visit but she sure takes her free legal services and continues to wreak havok with our lives. Advice? .
Like
Share
Advertisements
ContactChar
I don't understand. .. what is a collateral adoption?
ContactChar
It sounds to me like the GAL is a big problem. Do you know why he filed against you? What was the basis of his filing? Will he talk to your lawyer?
Okay, I have what may be a stupid question. What is a GAL? I know what the acronym stands for, I just don't know what this person does and why he was assigned to your son? What does he seem to have against you and why is his opinion so important in this situation? If this is too hard to discuss, don't worry about it, I am just trying to understand what is going on.Christie - this totally sucks! Jaefer:mad:
A GAL is the person (generally an attorney...or maybe always an attorney...I don't know?)---who's supposed to be UNBIASED......in representing the best interests of the child.
Usually, the GAL is someone that's been appointed (and gets paid).....who barely knows the child at all (Now I KNOW this isn't always the case, but it's not an uncommon scenario.), and is sitting there collecting money, while they are supposed to decide what's the best interest of the child they're representing.
They are a needed group, I believe, but time restraints often mean that they can't REALLY know the child they represent, KWIM?
Sincerely,
Linny
Advertisements
Linny, You have so much experience and knowledge. I am interested in knowing: what is your take on this? (Not just this part of it - but all of it?) Thanks,Christie
Linny
A GAL is the person (generally an attorney...or maybe always an attorney...I don't know?)---who's supposed to be UNBIASED......in representing the best interests of the child.Usually, the GAL is someone that's been appointed (and gets paid).....who barely knows the child at all (Now I KNOW this isn't always the case, but it's not an uncommon scenario.), and is sitting there collecting money, while they are supposed to decide what's the best interest of the child they're representing. They are a needed group, I believe, but time restraints often mean that they can't REALLY know the child they represent, KWIM? Sincerely, Linny