Advertisements
Advertisements
I don't know about the rest of you, but after blogging for over a year I find questions to be a gift. Questions greatly help me met my min quota of 20 blogs per month. I find Jan's blog to be my biggest gift this month. [URL="http://birthparents.adoptionblogs.com/index.php/weblogs/help-needed-to-understand"]Birth-First Parent Blog - Help Needed to Understand![/URL]
I wanted to pull a conversation from a blog comment into the forum. Sandra asked "And if instead we're talking about which circumstance is LEAST likely to have minimized, trivialized, marginalized, traumatized, neglected or mistreated children ...?"
I wanted to ask if anyone has done extensive reading on the Hague Adoption Treaty. Because this Treaty answers Sandra's question. Families who can parent their children (with support) are the best solution. I agree with this concerning the social orphans. About 70% of Ukrainian orphans are social orphans.
social orphans - orphaned due to economic conditions/poverty.
If a family loves their child and needs help keeping food on the table, that is what should happen. And the Ukrainian government has only started doing this in the last year.
But I don't think the answer (to Sandra's question) is as clear cut with neglected, abused and rejected children. In Eastern Europe disabled children are sent away. Society just doesn't accept them. My daughter Natasha is in the disabled child category.
Anyway, I was curious about everyone's thoughts.
Coming from the perspective of someone who was raised in an abusive environment, it is NEVER okay to leave a child in an abusive environment just because the abusers are blood-relatives. I grew up in that environment, and it has taken an enormous amount of work to overcome the aftereffects of the abuse. As an adult, I still have to deal with the baggage of how much contact to allow with abusive relatives. I get no comfort whatsoever in knowing that my abusers shared the same genetics.
- Faith
Advertisements
OK, I found this on the Hague Treaty
"The goal of the Convention is to protect the children, birth parents and adoptive parents involved in intercountry adoptions and to prevent abuses."
[URL="http://travel.state.gov/family/adoption/convention/convention_2290.html"]Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption and the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000: Background[/URL]
"Convinced of the necessity to take measures to ensure that intercountry adoptions are made in the best interests of the child and with respect for his or her fundamental rights, and to prevent the abduction, the sale of, or traffic in children,"
[URL="http://hcch.e-vision.nl/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=69"]HCCH | Full text[/URL]
Hmmm....
I haven't looked at the Hague treaty (very much) up to this point because it doesn't impact Ukrainian adoption. Ukraine hasn't signed the treaty.
My question was a follow to one in the comment immediately preceding that said that foster adoption was the least likely to have "minimized, trivialized", etc. birth parents. It was not a stand alone.
And I'm sorry, Angela, but the Hague does not answer all my questions. Not by a long shot.
I think your question can stand alone. It is something that Ukraine is greatly struggling with right now. They have been making many changes to their family law/foster care/orphanages/social services in the last 2 years. I should mention that UNICEF is pushing the Ukrainian government in certain directions. I really don't like how UNICEF thinks or operates (ugh!)
And Ukraine has started to make a very small dent on trafficking.
One of the recent rumors to make the rounds (inside of Ukraine) is that single people (like me) adopt children to use them as sex slaves. [FONT="]Unfortunately [/FONT]this rumor started out as a news story and got distorted. A single American father was recently convicted of sexually abusing 3 of his sons. They were adopted from Ukraine.
Ukraine is looking at ratifying the Hague Adoption Treaty. I just don't see how the Hague Treaty would really provide protect the children better. (but I keep being told that it will solve many problems/abuses.) I could just be ignorant on this subject... I will keep reading.
They are doing better now than last year in terms of child protection. But then there are issues like... the government is paying women to have babies. The population is decreasing.
There are programs like MAMA ([URL="http://ukraine.usaid.gov/success_full.shtml?p=449"]USAID/Ukraine - News & Events > Recent Events[/URL]). Ukraine is trying to get parents not to abandon their newly born HIV babies.
Anyway, I will go read some more. I am sure there are many blogs on Ukrainian children protection. I just need to get my thoughts organized.