Advertisements
Advertisements
has anyone ever been through this,,,what is your advice??we've had baby girl for 10 months now. ICPC placement for grandparents from both states have been approved, they told me to expect her to be placed at court date. what are the chances that this is true. We wrote the judge a letter asking for adoption, is there a chance it could be considered?? could this be done the day of court?? :eyebrows: just want to make sure so we are preparing to let go, just venting for insite
hkolln
Well not all family is unfit.
I don't know if this was directed at me, but I would never ever suggest that all family is unfit. Never.
Advertisements
LemonPie
I don't know if this was directed at me, but I would never ever suggest that all family is unfit. Never.
Oh no I was saying in general. I am saying just because we are related and the bioparents were drug addicts and felons that doesn't make us unfit also. I think family should have to prove themselves and come forward early on. I agree completely. I didn't mean it that way that people posting here see everyone related unfit. I'm just saying every situation can be different and if we screen family better it would be in the best interest of every child.
TemporaryMom
I don't think any of us think that ALL family is crazy, drug addicts, etc. at least, in two years on here, I have never seen that sentiment. However, the reality is that there is a very high correlation within the close family unit of these things.
The real problem with theses cases as I see it is lack of communication with the foster family. There is one member here who fought for ten months for placement of relative and longer for approval and the workers never told the foster family any of this so of course they bonded and after a year plus, thought they were the right placement for that child.
Part of the ICPC process should be REQUIRING the relative to complete at least once a month, or more depending on distance, visitation with the child(ren) so as to establish a bond. This serves two purposes, the foster family knows about you, and perhaps gets to know you, and more importantly, the child gets to know you.
Arguments to the effect of "this happened and everyone said it would be an issue and it is not because yadda, yadda, yadda," are faulty logic. You cannot disprove an argument simply by lack of evidence supporting it. You don't know that the child, in this case, might not be even better had they not gone through the loss or troubling situation. Not attacking you, just stating because this is an argument that is one of my biggest pet peeves. It is just like my other saying "I smoked and drank with you all and you turned out ok." I won't tell you how very wrong that statement is in relation to me and my sibs, but, it proves my point. Take me for example, I have a very high IQ, but I lack the discipline to be really good at any one thing, blame it on my ADD if you like. Maybe had my mother not smoked and drank while pregnant with me, I could have been the next Madame Curie.
Anyhoo, I think it is great that you did FP training, and I think that would also be a great condition to put on relative placements for two reasons. It might weed put the fictive or extended kin who are only taking the kids to give back to the bios, it happens, and it would give them the necessary training that we get on how to deal with the problems that some of the children may have. I think it is ridiculous that CPS places children with relative caregivers with no access to the training we get on topics such as Drug exposed infants.
Good idea, in theory, but I don't see how it's practical. My niece is quite literally across the country from me. A week has never gone by her entire life that I have not spoken to her on the phone. She has visited me and I have visited her.
Since she came into care, I have only been able to swing one trip out to see her and her parents objected so much that my attorney had to go to court to force it. Her GAL and SW didn't want me coming because they bought the parents' argument that it wouldn't be fair to the parents to let me see her more than they saw her (or they just didn't want a fight).
Anyway, financially, given my attorney fees in her case, as well as other financial obligations, it has been difficult to try and get there again. I did finally just buy a ticket, but it has been a lot longer than a month since my last visit.
Assuming our ICPC goes through by summer (highly doubtful at this point), if I went to see her monthly, it would cost me a minimum of $3,000 just for airfare, and then add in car rental, hotel, food. I just don't have that kind of money lying around (and I think we are solidly middle class).
I do have excellent communication with her FPs (both this one and the one before) and there is never any doubt in anyone's mind how much I want her.
Again, my situation is different because Niece is a teen. She can (and has) pick up the phone and call me. We can chat and catch up. How do you do that with an infant? How do monthly visits with an infant even help with bonding given their short memories? It really is a difficult thing to fashion a one-size-fits-all approach in these cases.
Yeah I know...I just wish it was easier and faster for family to be screened completely and ICPC's to be completed. Ours took 11 months and we were involved early on in case. We had 2 visits because we had to fly from Fl to ID both times. It was hard. Our licensing only took 2 months from MAPP class, background checks, home study, etc...but they had us on the fast track. The ICPC is what took so darn long. I wonder if it's any better? Ours was 6 years ago.
hkolln
Oh no I was saying in general.
*whew* Because I never want to give that impression. ;)
I strongly believe kids belong with family -- and I always push for locating family early in the case.
However, there are times when a family member looks okay on paper, but everyone knows they're not really okay. Those are the cases where the court is going to place with family because they're family... and the kiddo is going to end up back in care or with his own drug addiction or in jail.
Advertisements
Confused46
Good idea, in theory, but I don't see how it's practical. My niece is quite literally across the country from me. A week has never gone by her entire life that I have not spoken to her on the phone. She has visited me and I have visited her.
Since she came into care, I have only been able to swing one trip out to see her and her parents objected so much that my attorney had to go to court to force it. Her GAL and SW didn't want me coming because they bought the parents' argument that it wouldn't be fair to the parents to let me see her more than they saw her (or they just didn't want a fight).
Anyway, financially, given my attorney fees in her case, as well as other financial obligations, it has been difficult to try and get there again. I did finally just buy a ticket, but it has been a lot longer than a month since my last visit.
Assuming our ICPC goes through by summer (highly doubtful at this point), if I went to see her monthly, it would cost me a minimum of $3,000 just for airfare, and then add in car rental, hotel, food. I just don't have that kind of money lying around (and I think we are solidly middle class).
I do have excellent communication with her FPs (both this one and the one before) and there is never any doubt in anyone's mind how much I want her.
Again, my situation is different because Niece is a teen. She can (and has) pick up the phone and call me. We can chat and catch up. How do you do that with an infant? How do monthly visits with an infant even help with bonding given their short memories? It really is a difficult thing to fashion a one-size-fits-all approach in these cases.
I should have specified young and or non verbal children. Obviously you can chat with older kids. There will always be caveats but what is important should be the child. Even if it is an infant, you'd be amazed how much they remember. And there could be other means of maintaining that bond using Skype, pictures, etc. the trauma a toddler experiences from being pulled from their primary "parent" of a year or more is far different than the same for a teen or very young infant.
TemporaryMom
I should have specified young and or non verbal children. Obviously you can chat with older kids. There will always be caveats but what is important should be the child. Even if it is an infant, you'd be amazed how much they remember. And there could be other means of maintaining that bond using Skype, pictures, etc. the trauma a toddler experiences from being pulled from their primary "parent" of a year or more is far different than the same for a teen or very young infant.
You will not get an argument about that from me. Given my limited exposure to the system in this one case, it is abundantly clear to me that only the parents' rights matter. Children and their well-being are entirely secondary considerations. That is just so wrong! :hissy: :grr:
hkolln
Yeah I know...I just wish it was easier and faster for family to be screened completely and ICPC's to be completed. Ours took 11 months and we were involved early on in case. We had 2 visits because we had to fly from Fl to ID both times. It was hard. Our licensing only took 2 months from MAPP class, background checks, home study, etc...but they had us on the fast track. The ICPC is what took so darn long. I wonder if it's any better? Ours was 6 years ago.
I agree. It takes way too long! It isn't like we don't have computers and the Internet now! I think agencies purposely dredge their feet because A. They get more tax dollars for their state the longer they have a child, which means job security, B. they hope the bio parents can get it together because it looks better for their numbers if child is RU to bio parent, and C. Because it adds to the work of the county.
TemporaryMom
I think agencies purposely dredge their feet
Where I am, the delays all happen between the time an ICPC request is filed and the time that the final approval/denial is received -- which is the period when the local agency has little to no ability to affect how fast things move along.
My personal guess is that ICPC requests go to the bottom of a very big stack for the receiving state. When case managers already have a gazillion fires to put out, it's just not a surprise that those fires get priority over a request to do all the paperwork, interviews, visits, etc. for a family where no child is currently at risk.
I've never seen an ICPC request take forever because of the sending/requesting agency, but I would bet money that, when the situation is reversed, our local agencies are just as slow handling the ICPC requests they receive.
Advertisements
LemonPie
However, there are times when a family member looks okay on paper, but everyone knows they're not really okay. Those are the cases where the court is going to place with family because they're family... and the kiddo is going to end up back in care or with his own drug addiction or in jail.
That is terrible. I believe just being a relative is not a good reason to get placement. Kids deserve to be in stable, loving homes and not just with relatives because they are "blood." Having been licensed here in Florida I have spoken to a lot of FP's and what they go thru. We were told if our daughter was here in FL we'd have here in days placed with us but because she was across country it would take much longer. I'm glad we had to become licensed because it allowed us the benefits of regular FP's here and were able to keep Medicaid for her upon adoption and get an adoption subsidy to help with her therapy.
TemporaryMom
I agree. It takes way too long! It isn't like we don't have computers and the Internet now! I think agencies purposely dredge their feet because A. They get more tax dollars for their state the longer they have a child, which means job security, B. they hope the bio parents can get it together because it looks better for their numbers if child is RU to bio parent, and C. Because it adds to the work of the county.
Also a good point on the communication/visit aspect. If you can't afford (or be bothered to get access to) internet or a cheap webcam, how are you going to care for a child? Distance is so last century! ;)
controllnmychaos
Also a good point on the communication/visit aspect. If you can't afford (or be bothered to get access to) internet or a cheap webcam, how are you going to care for a child? Distance is so last century! ;)
Good point. ;)
controllnmychaos
Also a good point on the communication/visit aspect. If you can't afford (or be bothered to get access to) internet or a cheap webcam, how are you going to care for a child? Distance is so last century! ;)
It's true, and don't under estimate what even young infants can learn. When Chubbs was going through his stranger danger period, he wouldn't go near someone he doesn't know. We only see BFF once every few months now. But, he sees her face on the phone when we talk on speakerphone and knows her voice. So yep, would go right to her but no one else in her family. Similarly, I am good friends with an ex-bf. we talk on the phone, same thing, his picture in the phone contact icon. He came to visit me in October, first time Chubbs met him, he came walking up te drive, said hi, and Chubbs leaned over to let him take him. I was blown away. But Chubbs knew the face and voice so he wasn't a stranger.
Oh yea, and Monkey, she didn't do well with strangers. Her maternal gpa had narrated one of those recording books to night before Xmas her first year here. She listened to it a lot. The following thanksgiving, she is four now, I took them to her bio moms fathers family to see the gpa who was in town. Monkey cowered behind me, didn't even go to bio mom with everyone, but as soon as her gpa started talking to her, she went right to him, even climbed on his lap. Even he was surprised and I told him, it was because she knew his voice from reading the book over and over.
Advertisements
controllnmychaos
Also a good point on the communication/visit aspect. If you can't afford (or be bothered to get access to) internet or a cheap webcam, how are you going to care for a child? Distance is so last century! ;)
We tried this but FP's wouldn't let us communicate or made it quite hard for us. We had SW up set time for phone calls once a week and they'd not answer, we'd leave a VM and they wouldn't call us back. It works if both parties want it to. It wasn't us, we wanted contact and it's hard when one side tries everything to avoid it.
has anyone ever been through this,,,what is your advice??we've had baby girl for 10 months now. ICPC placement for grandparents from both states have been approved, they told me to expect her to be placed at court date. what are the chances that this is true. We wrote the judge a letter asking for adoption, is there a chance it could be considered?? could this be done the day of court?? :eyebrows: just want to make sure so we are preparing to let go, just venting for insite
Why would you want to adopt when this child clearly has family that WANTS and is CAPABLE of caring for her? That seems really selfish to me. You become a foster parent to help a child in need, TEMPORARILY until they can be reunified with their parents or placed with a relative. You did your job, now let her go. It’s not about you, it’s about her.
The ICPC process takes a while, so clearly the bio grand parents have been working with the agency for some time in order to get this baby girl out of foster care. She doesn’t have just one set of blood relatives willing and able to care for her, she has TWO. That is an ideal situation and a win! You should be celebrating and happy.
I’m not saying you can’t be sad, too and, of course, grieve the sense of loss, but unless you were never supportive of RU and became a foster parenting simply to adopt (something I seriously frown upon), then you should have known this was a possibility and the best outcome for that baby girl.
I’m happy for her ߘ