Advertisements
I am a distant relative attempting to adopt the two children of my cousin. My cousin and his wife are seperated. They both are drug users and parental rights have been terminated.
The children are now in the state system awaiting adoption.
It is common knowlegde within the family that the birth grandparents also use drugs but I have no way of proving it officially. It is one of those dark family secrets. They were also physically abusive to myself and my cousins when we were little kids, so even if they cleaned uptheir drug habit, I would fear the b-grandparents' judgement & behaviors in reguard to kids.
Prior to the adoption situation I had no adult-years contact with this side of the family as I chose to live a healthy and productive life. They have recently told me that they do not consider me family.
In our home study my husband & I stated that we were not opposed to contact with the birthparents with the stipulation that they would have to be reformed - have gone through rehabilitation and proven stable & clean before we would allow a contact as we do not condone drugs or want to subject these children to the even more complicated emotional trauma of interacting with drug users.
We did not bring up the issue of the birth grandparent's drug use
but were told that they have been very vocal about being against our adopting these children.
Since I am a blood relative I do not have the option of a closed adoption and we do want the children to benefit by continuing their relationships with the more stable people in our family.
My question is this: How much and what kind of contact should the birthparents and the birth grandparents have in reguard to maintaining their relationship with these children?
Has anyone ever had an open adoption and later felt thay had to cut off or limit the contact ?
Like
Share
I would not think it would matter whether you were a 'blood relative' or not concerning the well-being of the children you wish to adopt. If these people who are using drugs were strangers, you wouldn't want the children to be exposed to them......just because they share a bloodline doesn't mean they should have "special considerations"!
I think you sound as if you have really, sensibly thought this out. If you considered any differently, then I would worry about your concern for the children! (Sounds like you'll be a great parent!)
I think I'd tell a c/w that 'if the relatives "clean up their act"....then you would consider involvement from them. If this were to happen (cleaning up, I mean), then it would seem good to involve them with the children. However, like I said, you wouldn't want a stranger involved with drugs to have much involvement with your kids, why would a relative be any different? That's not to say the kids wouldn't know 'who the relatives were, what was going on, etc'.....but actually 'visiting' with the kids, unsupervised? No way.
Linny
Advertisements
I feel very strongly about open adoption for the sake of the children being adopted, but it is hard for me to say that drug abusing parents should be allowed the same degree of openness as everyone else. I know that everyone has their own problems, some worse than others, but my best friend is a drug abuser going through treatment and I have seen first hand how she lives her life. I will never be able to understand why people turn to drugs, and I have a hard time being sympathetic to those who do. I know that there are people who are able to get past those bad decisions in their lives and turn their lives around, I also know that there are many more who relapse. If I was in a situation like yours, I would make very clear what I would expect of anyone seeing my child, not just the birthfamily. I would expect proof of sobriety, and a healthy lifestyle before any face to face contact would be allowed to occur. Those are things that would be set in stone. Alllowing communication through the mail might be a good way to allow openness, if the family isn't staying clean. I do feel though that you shouldn't hide the truth about the other family members from the children, you can't protect them forever, and if they grow up and find out the truth on their own it would be a very tough issue to handle. In the end, you have to do what is right for the children, but only as long as they are kept safe.
lisa