Advertisements
I posted on the other thread that I had started reading the book, and that when I had completed it, I would start a new discussion.
Well, I couldnt even finish it҅I think I made it to chapter six before I just couldnt deal with what she was saying anymore҅
Now, I certainly am NOT discounting anyoneŒs healing, or anyones feelings regarding the book, and the way it makes them feel҅this is my own personal feeling about it
I just couldnŒt stop rolling my eyes long enough to readI mean, some of the stuff I understand and agree with, but a lot of it, to me, is pretty out there. I certainly believe that there are some people who were affected like this, but I just donŒt feel I am one of them.
I feel like I already have an explanation for a lot of my suffering and problems, so maybe thats why it was so hard to read҅I dont know. I just know, for me at least, it wasnҒt something I wanted to continue to read; it seemed pointless.
So, is the whole book talking about adoptees reaction to be separated from the birth mothers? If so, where do adoptive parents fit in, are their actions (or lack of) totally not to blame? I know at one point it mentioned that adoptive parents were told to take their child home and treat it just like it was their own, and theyd never know҅I guess I just dont understand҅
Maybe I will try to read it again some timewho knows.
Like
Share
Originally posted by dl
This may have been the experience of some bmothers, but many adoptees that have reunited or attempted to reunite have discovered that this was not the experience of their bmother ~ that relinquishment was a choice that bmother/bparents made.
Based on my conversations with my half-siblings they have many more wounds from the life they led being kept , than I have from being relinquished and adopted. Two of them have specifically stated that they wish they had been adopted.
Did some bmothers/bfathers have no choice. Obviously. But many did have a choice and not all bfathers "failed mightily to step up to the plate". My bmother did not choose to parent her first two children. She used the same adoption agency both times. I'm sure it was not easy for her in 1953 as a single woman to keep a mixed race child but again, that was the choice she made. Unfortunately she basically abandoned the three children she kept and died at a young age.
Each story is unique and different IMO ~ whether a bparent, an adoptee or an aparent.
Advertisements
To re-engergize a highly debatable topic... I am currently reading the Primal Wound and find it very enlightening. I am a healthy person, able to put myself through college and hold a good job. I am in a long term relationship and I pay my taxes. I even served our beautiful country after college.
I am also a birthmother in a recent reunion with my daughter and am grateful for reading this book. No, I don't think she is necessarily as tramatized as this book might suggest, however, I as a well adjusted, healthy, self-reliant individual who does not consider herself a victim, can related in many ways to this theory. Therefore, it is possible that my daughter can as well and now I am able to know that so that we can work through things together if necessary.
There are many sides to adoption and just as every birth and every family is different, I also believe so is every adoption. There are definite common threads and somethings apply to some an not others. I am glad it was written and that I had the opportunity to read it.
Kimberly
I have read the book and while I can see alot of my past behavior in it's pages the explanations are highly speculative pretty out there. You just can't blame anybody else for the person you are.
How can anyone know how adoption affected them when it is their only experience of life? We need to recognise the past but not to dwell on it because no one can change it.
I searched for meaning in life for many years and longed for my birthmother. Now I have all the purpose fufillment and meaning anyone could want and I found it in my creator, savior and King, Jesus Christ. I wrote a letter to my Birthmum and am waiting for a response but my sense of worth or well being doesn't depend on it.
I just started reading PW last night. I found it to be confusing. I could identify with some of the text but some just seemed to be excuses for bad behavior. I will finish the book and Im thinking of buying my A mom a copy. She and I talked about it a little today and she said "why didnt they tell me I was dealing with grieving babies? That kinda makes since." Ill post again after she reads it.
Lisa
Advertisements
BrandyHagz
I just couldnt stop rolling my eyes long enough to read҅I mean, some of the stuff I understand and agree with, but a lot of it, to me, is pretty out there.
stacyone
You know, I read an interview with Verrier where she admitted she never really bonded the same way with her adoptive daughter as with her biodaughter. I can't help but wonder if coming up with the "primal wound" idea was her way of excusing her own guilt... just a thought...
BrandyHagz. Nancy Verrier is not saying that aparents don't have a role. In fact there is a whole section of the book devoted to trying to help adoptive parents to act in ways that will help them to bond successfully with their kids & to help them understand the various behaviours & reactions that may arise (+ how to cope). The book is very big. However, it is perhaps better to read chunks that appeal to you or to just dip in & read little bits. Over time, you can move on to some other parts &, that way, you will get through the book in the end. I know that I found this to be the best way for me to cope with reading "Coming Home to Self" and that it did help me to understand many things. Some people misinterpret what is being said in the book. Perhaps Verrier should look at producing a set of smaller books made up of this one huge tome & phrase it in easier language so that more people "get" what is being said more easily. I hope I don't get "crucified" for suggesting this. I realise that many people have strong feelings against the book. Nevertheless, IMHO, it is a worthwhile addition to the literature out there on adoption.
Advertisements
Yes there is such a thing as a PRIMAL WOUND..unfortunately this woman now owns the copyright to it...I have to disagree with the book....it comes across as being a thesis into the hearts and minds of all...just take a glance at these forums, there are some common threads but there are just as many conflicting..there is no defining..no pill to swallow..no format ore template for feeling.....We do not have to shed the child...we are who we are and we all stumble and trip our way through life differently............as for a wound....it is deep and I have no idea how to dress it.....
Umbilical child
Yes there is such a thing as a PRIMAL WOUND..unfortunately this woman now owns the copyright to it...I have to disagree with the book....it comes across as being a thesis into the hearts and minds of all...just take a glance at these forums, there are some common threads but there are just as many conflicting..there is no defining..no pill to swallow..no format ore template for feeling.....We do not have to shed the child...we are who we are and we all stumble and trip our way through life differently............as for a wound....it is deep and I have no idea how to dress it.....
Pinakitha
The book is very big. However, it is perhaps better to read chunks that appeal to you or to just dip in & read little bits. Over time, you can move on to some other parts &, that way, you will get through the book in the end.
I am a reunited adoptee and was encouraged to read the book by a birthmother. I was born in the early 60's and when I read the part where it talked of babies being given pheonbarbatal to keep babies from crying for their mothers I broke down and cried because I very well could have been one of those babies given that medication due to the fact of the times and that I was cared for in the hospital nursery for the first three weeks of my life. I also found many things in the book that describes my life to a T. At times parts of it were scary for me to read knowing how much I was able to relate to the issues mentioned in the book.
I am the wife of an adoptee and found the book very enlightening. I was from the world that thinks you take a baby and place them in a good home and everything is ok but I'm finding out that, that isn't always the case. I'm finding out adoptee's have alot of the same issues. My husband feels more comfortable around people who have been adopted because he feels they understand him and I don't. I earmarked so many pages because I said oh my gosh my husband is acting this way. I'm not sure if he is acting this way due to a Primal Wound but there is something going on.Even coming here and reading some of your stories I can totally relate them to my husband.Wether you agree with or reject the theory you can look past that and read the parts about the behavior which has very much helped me as a spouse understand my husband better.There is another book by Betty Lifton who also makes the same claim about the 'wound' and Betty is an adoptee.
Advertisements
Manisha
HAve you read anymore?