Advertisements
Advertisements
I am feeling somewhat emotional today. It’s not been a good couple of months (six?) and it just seems to be getting worse and worse.
At any rate, since I started personal journaling, I’ve been reading more and more blogs out there, wondering what is on everyone’s mind. I’m an EOBR (Equal Opportunity Blog Reader) and will read just about anything related to adoption.
Sometimes, this offers great insight.
Then sometimes, it sends me spiraling out of control with frustration.
I read a blog yesterday in which a hopeful adoptive mom was talking about how she has a friend who is willing (!!!) to tattoo (!!!!) her infant (!!!!!) upon adoption…so that if s/he is ever kidnapped by the birth parents, they will be able to tell who their child is, since DNA testing isn’t an option in adoption.
!!!
Now, I know, honestly, that there have been extremely remote cases of abduction in infant adoption. So few, in fact, that I can only really think of one case in the last (decade?) however long I have been actively involved in Adoption Issues.
The case with that girl in Florida who surrendered then revoked her consent to terminate her parental rights to the twins she’d conceived using ART then placed for adoption in the midst of sever PPD. That’s the only one know about…and wow, aren’t those some very unique and extenuating circumstances that most (I’d venture to say almost ALL) first parents will never experience (the ART etc…).
At any rate – this ‘stereotyper’ was heavy on the comments about how these low life women (!!!) will steal and resale (RESALE!) their infants – and she wants to avoid that by placing a discreetly hidden tattoo on the infant she adopts. She used immunizations as justification for the pain…
She had LOTS of people who agreed…posting links to stories where children, still in foster care, were abducted by their parents. She had people wondering how they too could ‘protect their little investment’ (NOT my words) by doing the same.
How do we get through to these people? How can we really distinguish the difference for people who are clearly clueless.
I speak not only as a first parent – but by golly, as an adoptee too. A tattoo!?
Oh, when asked about legalities – she explained that parental consent was all that was required, if you had a willing artist.
I really wonder what she’ll tattoo? A barcode?
Ugh.
How do you deal with Stereotypers?
Anyone else noticed a HUGE influx of really ill-educated hopeful-members and members of the triad? :hissy:
I didnt think you can legally give a baby a tattoo, notwithstanding the aparents' logic for giving their child one.
I would think the tattoo artist would question a lady bringing in a baby for a tattoo and report her to the proper authorities.
Amy K, NJ
Advertisements
In this instance I think the tattoo artist was a friend of the Mom so she was willing to do it. In general I would hope that a tattoo artist would question it, but who's to say really? It's just so sad and sick....
belleinblue1978
I don't know... it is a dicey situation. My kidnapping plans keep me from really focusing on their problems. :P
Excellent point. For me, it would more be that the drugs really affected both my long term AND short term memory, so I know I wouldn't be capable.
thanksgivingmom
Excellent point. For me, it would more be that the drugs really affected both my long term AND short term memory, so I know I wouldn't be capable.
For me it's the emotional instability that makes it difficult for me to function in the real world. Of course the promiscuous behavior coupled with all the white powder on my nose might add to it...
Personally, I don't think tattooing is the answer. That's soooo... Ninetys.
Micro-chips are the only way to go. Birthmom's could do this too so that the aparents don't come back a claim all subsequent children (Leigh!) Think of the possibilities!! Maybe even tracking devices -
I hope somewhere in the adoption paperwork this potential adoptive mom is exposed. Can you imagine how neurotic her baby would grow up to be? Knowing they had a tattoo to prevent their birthmom from kidnapping him/her?? <shudder>
Advertisements
Youre on to something Oceans҅I mean tattooing isnt just sooo ninetys, itҒs also rather pedestrianA microchip is the answer. I also like the idea of tiny tracking devicesŅit would make it so much easier for us to stalk!
Well, and think of the revenue we can generate to support our various habits by charging enormous monthly subscription fees.
We all know aparents are loaded. They can afford it!
sorry guys...i'm too busy counting all my money to respond at the moment...
but ya know...no matter what we do, there are always going to be these stupid idea's floating around. All we can do is represent ourselves and our situations as best we can.
Advertisements
Leigh,
Those darn pennies are hard to count with all those babies running around, huh?
:p
Thanks for the 'jest' - I've had a really rough few weeks and needed the laugh...
...as an amom I have sometimes wondered how I would "prove" my son is mine if we were to be seperated. Obviously, I odn't share his DNA...But because we have an open adoption, his other mom would be there to prove it with HER dna. So that just shows you how an open adoption can actually prevent these worries, rather than compounding them.
So that just shows you how an open adoption can actually prevent these worries, rather than compounding them.
Except, in this case, the adoptive mother (potential, I might add) was concerned about the birth mother kidnapping - not anyone else. So, while that works in your case :) (awesome!) it doesn't seem that this would solve this mothers problem LOL
I wish I knew how to grab a quote from another post to respond, but I can't figure it out! I am responding to your post...I agree, the woman who wanted to tattoo a baby is unlikely to see the benefits of open adoption, LOL.
Advertisements
I myself have a couple of tattos. I was thinking one day, it's too bad that my son doesn't have one as a distinguishing mark, since we don't share DNA. He's International adopted, so there's no chance of getting it from any birthfamily.
But, I never thought seriously of taking him for a tattoo!
My son currently has 2 distinguishing marks - a Mongolian spot and a geographic tongue. I had a kids ID done through school. I put both on the application - the didn't list the geographic tongue. Which irritates me. That won't go away. The Mongolian spot is fading.
But my son's finger prints are on file with my state. No, he hasn't been arrested - no yet anyway. He's only 7. There is a local research company doing a research project for the state of NY to study children's fingerprints and the way they change over the years. My son is a partcipant.
The hope for this project is that they will be able to 'project' a fingerprint for many years after a child is missing, kind of like the age progression photos they do.
I think the study will last 5 years. We got a free ID card for it with his fingerprints on the card and his picture. Next week he has his prints and photo redone for year 2. I really hope that they get alot out of this study and can use it to bring kids home.
Sorry, I guess I highjacked and went off course!