The Differences Between Open Adoption And Closed Adoption

Open communication between birth families and adoptive families can mean face-to-face visits, phone calls, or even letters and photographs sent to home addresses.
The open communication sometimes begins before placement and can continue through an adoptee’s lifetime.

According to this study, maintaining an open adoption enhances the relationship between a parent and child relationship while also helping the child understand different roles of their birth and adoptive families.

In a closed adoption, there is typically no communication between the birth parent(s), adoptee, and adoptive family. Minimal information is transferred between parties.
Because recent research suggests benefits to having an open adoption, closed adoptions are becoming less common.

While closed adoptions can be helpful for maintaining a birth family’s privacy, this study shows only five percent of US domestic infant adoptions are closed.
The remaining 95 percent have some level of openness between birth families and adoptive families.

There may not be concrete plans for future communication between the families and adoptee, but a semi-open adoption allows the adoptive family to send updates to their child’s birth family via a third party.

Often times, no return communication is expected.

This study found 40% of adoptions are semi-open which means birth families, adoptees and adoptive families have mediated contact, usually through an agency or attorney.
Semi-open adoptions typically include access to important social and medical history for the adoptee.

To learn more about the pros and cons of open adoption, semi-open adoption and closed adoption, check out the following studies:

Bridging the Divide: Openness in Adoption and Post-adoption Psychosocial Adjustment among Birth and Adoptive Parents

Openness in Adoption

Risks and Benefits of Open Adoption

Minnesota/Texas Adoption Research Project